[
http://www.jahia.net/jira/browse/SENSEI-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#action_25669
]
Sergiy Shyrkov logged work on SENSEI-78:
----------------------------------------
Author: Sergiy Shyrkov
Created on: 10/Dec/08 08:36
Start Date: 10/Dec/08 08:36
Worklog Time Spent: 4 hours
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Time Spent: 4 hours
> Partial Page Validations and other integrity checks enforcement issues
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SENSEI-78
> URL: http://www.jahia.net/jira/browse/SENSEI-78
> Project: Jahia Workflows
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: Workflow 6.0 (Andromeda)
> Environment: 23281
> Reporter: Stephane Croisier
> Assignee: Sergiy Shyrkov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Workflow 6.0 (Beta)
>
> Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg
>
> Time Spent: 4 hours
> Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
>
> I have some problems in order to try to make integrity checks run and be
> blockers in my workflow engine.
> My use case:
> - I have a John user (RWA from home page). With root I removed all roles in
> the Admin Center in order to bypass the integrity checks. So such checks
> should now become blocker
> - I have a page (already validated) with two containers
> - I update both containers and I add a broken link in the second one (a link
> pointing to a page in staging only). The edition engine correctly didplay the
> warning message.
> - I validate my page. The Workflow Manager indicated a "partial" validation
> (ok this should then validate the first container modifications but not the
> second one as there is a broken url in this one)
> My bad url is published in live mode !!!
> So two paradigms are unclear:
> - The SP4 introduces a notion of "partial validation" (if the page has a
> title, only valid containers are published... but any error on a container
> within this page will not block the full page). This is unclear if this
> "partial validation" paradigm still works on Andromeda. Ideally speaking I
> think that such a setting should be editable in the workflow type sub-engine
> (checkbox with some partial or complete validation). In the worst case
> cenario this should be at least a variable in the jahia.properties so that a
> webmaster can decide if the whole page needs to be ok before any validation
> or if we can already validate a part of the page even if some containers are
> not corrected yet.
> - The removal of the bypass integrity roles does not seem to work (and are
> quite obfuscated as this is the opposite role as expected as you have to
> remove users in order to make the warnings a blocker).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://www.jahia.net/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
jira_list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.jahia.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jira_list
