> I need to do some more tests, as it may turn out that this still does not
> give enough control over connection re-use.

It's the same with the Apache Commons HTTPClient - it automatically reuses 
connections.  
Which, when you're simulating multiple users is really the wrong thing to do.  
Ideally, you'd 
want connections re-used by thread.  I assume the only way we'll get this in JMeter is 
to take 
the commons code and modify it to JMeter's needs.

-Mike

> 
> Sebastian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 April 2003 07:31
> To: JMeter Developers List
> Subject: Re: Persistent connections - what implementation to use?
> 
> 
> From what I have seen on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list it is not possible
> to use LGPL libraries as runtime dependencies in ASF licensed projects.  I
> am pretty sure there is a licensing mailing list for discussing these kinds
> of issues (licensing at jakarta dot apache dot org).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Scott
> -- 
> Scott Eade
> Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
> http://www.backstagetech.com.au
> .Mac Chat/AIM: seade at mac dot com
> 
> 
> On 2/04/2003 3:59 AM, "BAZLEY, Sebastian"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > The Innovation version is one I found when looking for details on how
> > HttpUrlConnection works.
> > 
> > <quote>
> > The whole thing is free, and licenced under the GNU Lesser General Public
> > License (LGPL) (note that this is not the same as the GPL).
> > </quote>
> > 
> > I guess that means it could be used with JMeter ... I intend to give it a
> > try anyway for our purposes.
> > 
> > I can try and fix the SSL code so that it does not stomp on the setting.
> > I'm not sure I'll be able to test it properly, but I'll try and do it in a
> > way that does not affect the existing usage.
> > 
> > S.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Stover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 01 April 2003 17:09
> > To: JMeter Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Persistent connections - what implementation to use?
> > 
> > 
> > We once took a look at the jakarta commons http client.  It looks good,
> but
> > not 
> > significantly different from Sun's implementation.  I've never heard of
> the
> > innovation 
> > one - what kind of license does it have?
> > 
> > I don't know why the SSLManager does the things it does - that's one of
> the
> > bits I 
> > didn't write.  Feel free to fix it if you're inclined...
> > 
> > -Mike
> > 
> > On 1 Apr 2003 at 16:40, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote:
> > 
> >> We are using JMeter to test a Tomcat servlet application, and would like
> > to
> >> be able to test using persistent connections.
> >> 
> >> [The clients would normally connect/login once, and then re-use the same
> >> connection for subsequent requests.]
> >> 
> >> However, there are one or two problems with doing this, not least the use
> > of
> >> the default Sun implementation of HttpURLConnection, which is not
> >> particularly well-suited to connection re-use.
> >> 
> >> There are a couple of alternatives that look feasible:
> >> 
> >> HTTPClient 0.3-3     http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/
> >> HttpClient 2.0alpha3
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/index.html
> >> 
> >> The former seems to be a lot simpler to use, as far as I can tell.
> >> 
> >> Just wondering if anyone else has looked at this before I go any further?
> >> 
> >> ==
> >> 
> >> Also, does anyone know why the System property
> > "java.protocol.handler.pkgs"
> >> is set by SSLManager.java and SSLManagerCommand.java?
> >> 
> >> This currently precludes the use of HTTPClient 0.3-3 as a plug-in
> >> replacement for the basic Sun implementation.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> The opinions expressed herein are my own, and are not necessarily
> endorsed
> >> by my employer ...
> [snip sigbloat]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the 
> individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are 
> solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
> SchlumbergerSema.
> If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received
> this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, 
> or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.
> 
> If you have received this email in error please notify the
> SchlumbergerSema Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 121 627 5600.
> _________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



--
Michael Stover
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM: mstover_ya
ICQ: 152975688
AIM: mstover777

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to