> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jordi Salvat i Alabart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 December 2003 14:48
> To: JMeter Developers List
> Subject: Re: Another suggestion for the proxy
>
> En/na BAZLEY, Sebastian ha escrit:
> > I like that; perhaps this idea could be extended to (some)
> other test
> > elements?
>
> I was thinking in the same direction. We need to be careful:
> I'm already
> using the HTTP Proxy as a container to store the listener to record
> results, which does not quite match this idea... One step at a time,
> though :-)
I'd forgotten about that.
But there are ways round that, I'm sure. e.g. could use a sub-container to
hold the other items.
>
> > Or was the idea to copy the Timer element to the generated
> test plan, and
> > replace the variable name (if found) with the actual time delay?
>
> Yes, that's it. Silly substring replacement. Then we can
> choose between
> REPLACE_ME_PLEASE or ${REPLACE_ME_PLEASE} for that substring,
> but that's
> mostly a cosmetics issue.
>
I don't think this is cosmetic - ${X} means use X as a function/variable,
which is not the case, to my mind.
ACTUAL_DELAY would do. Could be a language resource, unless we can find a
string that makes sense in all languages ...
> I've also considered the option of having some element define the
> variable, and the timer use it as a regular variable. But
> that would be
> difficult and I don't think it's worth the hassle.
Agreed.
As far as I can see, the variable would only be used once anyway.
S.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
