that's a good idea. I'll make that change later today along with some other enhancements.
I thought about excluding the jmeter unit tests, but I couldn't decide. basically, I took the easy way out and decided not to filter them. I can always add them later. I like the idea of slowly moving the unit tests to some other jar, since it is just for the developers. should we make the 2.1 RC and post it? I can give it a try if others are busy. It might take me a few hours to figure out how to go about doing that. peter On 7/21/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it would be better to use the Sampler name as the sample > label, and save the junit class + method as the sampler data. > > That way, one can aggregate multiple samples with different class/method > names. > > == > > Also, I'm not sure that many existing JMeter JUnit tests would make > sense to test, so maybe jmeter classes should be excluded from the > list? > > Perhaps better would be to move all the JMeter tests to a separate > source tree and/or separate jar file. This could then be excluded from > the normal binary distribution, as the tests are only really needed by > developers. > > S. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
