right, but I would like to avoid asking users to download yet another
jar lib. seems like such  a hassle for users to have to go find the
jar file and download it.

perhaps this would be better as a sourceforge project that just plugs
in to jmeter or reuses jmeter components.

peter


On 8/8/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not saying we should not write code to use JCharts, just that we
> should not distribute the jar.
> 
> For example, the BeanShell jar is optional, but the code exists to use it.
> Likewise we don't (can't) redistribute mail.jar and activation.jar.
> 
> Needs a bit of care to ensure that the code behaves sensibly if the
> jar is missing at run-time, but otherwise is not all that difficult.
> 
> Any JMeter code that uses JCharts should be in a separate jar if not
> application anyway.
> 
> S.
> On 08/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > in that case, would it be better to write our own chart/graph ?
> >
> >
> > peter
> >
> > On 8/8/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I can't see any benefit of including JCharts in the JMeter zips or CVS
> > > - if people want to use it, they can download the jar for themselves,
> > > and be sure of getting the latest.
> > >
> > > We should just provide any necessary instructions, eg in the extras 
> > > directory.
> > >
> > > S.
> > >
> > > On 08/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > that's a good point. I didn't think that far. I suppose we can always
> > > > have 2 downloads:
> > > >
> > > > 1. jmeter normal
> > > > 2. jmeter with reporting
> > > >
> > > > of course, this assumes I do a decent job on the reporting component
> > > > and people actually want to use it. I think jcharts uses apache style
> > > > license, but I'll make sure.
> > > >
> > > > peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/8/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Agreed we can't at present include LGPL jars in JMeter distributions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Even with JCharts, I wonder whether the jar should be included with
> > > > > JMeter, as not everyone will need the functionality.
> > > > >
> > > > > S.
> > > > > On 08/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Since JasperReports is LGPL, we can't really use it. I took a look
> > > > > > around and it looks like jcharts provides some good functionality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://jcharts.sourceforge.net/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I already started working on the GUI and framework part of it. Most 
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > the design tries to stay close to current JMeter design patterns and
> > > > > > conventions. I plan to check something into CVS HEAD at the end of 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > week. Should I check it into the new Subversion instead?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/4/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > I was think to write/configure the report settings.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/4/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'm not sure what the point of the gui is.  Although it's nice 
> > > > > > > > to show a
> > > > > > > > report gui, there are other tools for that.  I'm thinking these 
> > > > > > > > report
> > > > > > > > generators are essentially creating output for
> > > > > > > > excel/staroffice/jasperreports/image viewers/etc - not for 
> > > > > > > > JMeter.  A
> > > > > > > > gui in JMeter could assist to control command-line parameters 
> > > > > > > > to the
> > > > > > > > report generator, but that's it, IMO.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I just don't want to get JMeter into the business of being 
> > > > > > > > report
> > > > > > > > viewing software.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:44 -0400, Peter Lin wrote:
> > > > > > > > > JCharts uses apache style license, so we can use that for the 
> > > > > > > > > charts
> > > > > > > > > and graphs. in terms of reports, it might be nice to have a 
> > > > > > > > > separate
> > > > > > > > > reporting GUI. Though I was thinking of taking the easy way 
> > > > > > > > > out and
> > > > > > > > > have it be a normal jmeter plugin that loads in the same gui
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 8/4/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Yay Apache and licensing issues...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It sounds to me like a reporting framework should not be 
> > > > > > > > > > linked to
> > > > > > > > > > JMeter's gui in any way - it serves no purpose.  What is 
> > > > > > > > > > needed is an
> > > > > > > > > > extendable framework for writing reporting components that 
> > > > > > > > > > take a .jtl
> > > > > > > > > > file and convert it to whatever report a user wants.  
> > > > > > > > > > Running this tool
> > > > > > > > > > should be simple and not tied to JMeter itself (though a 
> > > > > > > > > > menu option to
> > > > > > > > > > run a report on a jtl would be good).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't know what form is should take - ready-made xslt 
> > > > > > > > > > scripts (yuck),
> > > > > > > > > > JasperReport scripts (or whatever - I'm not familiar with 
> > > > > > > > > > Jasper), or
> > > > > > > > > > something else.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Keep in mind a .jtl file can be either an xml or csv format.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -Mike
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 11:50 -0400, Peter Lin wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > the idea of using jasper reports sounds nice, but not 
> > > > > > > > > > > sure about
> > > > > > > > > > > license issues, since jasperReports uses LGPL license.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 8/4/05, Joseph Fifield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > This is basically what I did with xslt to generate the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > html reports when
> > > > > > > > > > > > I did the ant task. What about doing something similar 
> > > > > > > > > > > > to generate
> > > > > > > > > > > > reports in other formats? This should be relatively 
> > > > > > > > > > > > straightforward for
> > > > > > > > > > > > something like JasperReports as the report files are 
> > > > > > > > > > > > just xml anyway.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Joe
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Peter Lin wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > yeah, I was thinking the same thing. this way, in an 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > automation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > process, it might run several test plans and save the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JTL files to a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > specific directory.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > after the tests are done running, jmeter could be 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > called to process
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the JTL files and output the reports.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > peter
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/4/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>It would be useful if the Reporters could read 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>existing test logs in
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>non-GUI mode too - assuming of course that the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>relevant raw data has
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>been logged.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>S.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>On 04/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>you're right, there probably needs to be a GUI 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>component for creating
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>the report settings. the primary difference between 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>the simple data
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>writer and report components is the reports would be 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>for statistics.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>for example, say an user has an overnight automation 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>process that hits
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>a website. if the user wants to generate a detailed 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>report of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>failures by HTTP response codes, we currently don't 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>support that. if
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>the user wants to those stats to be in a pie chart, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>we also don't
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>support that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>I have a need for report automation, so I think it 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>"might" be a good
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>idea to have them be separate type of components like
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>StatisticalReport components.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>peter
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to