+ on putting the fixes into 2.1 I can do that tonight if others are busy.
peter On 8/11/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why would we include HEAD changes? Clearly they were put there to avoid > going out in 2.1 - there'd be *no* other reason to make the changes in > HEAD. Let's not start committing the same changes to both branches ala > 2.0. > > I second putting Sergei's fixes in 2.1 branch before release. > > -Mike > > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:43 +0100, sebb wrote: > > Should we include the recent HEAD changes? > > If so, we need to fix the missing component docs. > > > > Also, might be an idea to include the recent fix to redirect/image > > download posted by Sergei Riaguzov > > > > S. > > On 10/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > when do we want to try for 2.1 release? > > > > > > peter > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
