+0 I don't use iSaSiLk, but I thought our ANT checks for that.
peter On 8/17/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As the subject says - I think we should probably drop the classes that > depend on the (commercial) iSaSiLk package. > > I don't think it's now necessary, given the JSSE support in 1.4, and > it would simplify the builds a bit if it were removed. > > S. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
