I don't either / Ant does.

But setting up Eclipse is tedious.

I'll leave this for after 2.1.

S.
On 17/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +0
> 
> I don't use iSaSiLk, but I thought our ANT checks for that.
> 
> peter
> 
> 
> On 8/17/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As the subject says - I think we should probably drop the classes that
> > depend on the (commercial) iSaSiLk package.
> >
> > I don't think it's now necessary, given the JSSE support in 1.4, and
> > it would simplify the builds a bit if it were removed.
> >
> > S.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to