The User-Defined Config Element doesn't work as you describe in my
instance.  In my instance, functions didn't work in it either, just like
the Test Plan (before I fixed the Test Plan).  Now, I've fixed it just
like the Test Plan and now both behave the same - ie functions are
resolved once at test start.

Question is, should I check this code in before the 2.1 release?  I
judge it somewhat risky code.

-Mike

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 16:04 -0400, Michael Stover wrote:
> Funny you should mention that as I've just reworked the TestPlan element
> so that functions can be used in it's user-defined variables section
> (they will be evaluated once - useful for, say ,the __P function).  I'm
> wondering whether I dare risk committing it for the 2.1 release.
> 
> The bug you mention regarding the config element is very interesting.
> Sounds like a neat feature actually :-)  I'll take a look..
> 
> 
> -Mike
> 
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 19:37 +0000, Peter Bernier wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm just trying to figure out whether or not this is a bug.
> > 
> > When you have a User-Defined Variables Config Element at the Test-Plan
> > level (as opposed to on the Test Plan node itself), variables are
> > re-calculated with every request (as opposed to at the Thread Group or
> > below level where they're calculated once).
> > 
> > This is different from the behaviour of this Config Element anywhere else
> > in a Test Plan. I'm just wondering whether this is expected behaviour,
> > or not?
> > 
> > Specifically what's got me is that in the Component Reference (Sec
> > 15.4.14) It says "The User Defined Variables lets you define variables
> > for use in other test elements, just as in the Test Plan.", but this
> > isn't quite accurate since you can use functions (ie, __Random) on the
> > UDV Config Element whereas you can't on the Test Plan's UDV.
> > 
> > The reason I bring this up is that I've recently switched to storing
> > TestPlan-wide variables in a UDV Config Element at the Test-Plan level
> > as opposed to on the Test Plan node itself. (due to Bug 35872)
> > 
> > - Peter Bernier
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to