>> > > The MailReader Sampler has already been enhanced in JMeter 2.3.2 to >> > > handle POP3S and IMAPS. >> I saw these changes, obviously somebody was faster than we were ;-) >> > > I don't think it makes sense to add the check for failure code - that >> > > can be done with an Assertion. >> The check for failure has been added to be able to catch any kind of >> exceptions to be thrown within the sampler (e.g. within the SSL session, >> in case no plaintext connection is supported, ...). AFAICR these cases >> cannot be addressed by an assertion, am I wrong? > > Not sure; I've not tried. I'm almost sure it doesn't work with an assertion right now... > > However I think the solution would be to enhance the Assertions if > necessary, not to add special code to the sampler. agree! can we put these enhancements to the community or shall we try to find some time to do it by ourselves? > >> > > StartTLS looks as though it can be added simply by updating the >> > > properties list, so is not a problem. > >> Agree. Is this already planned for future releases? > > There's no release plan for it at present, but it can certainly be added. this would be nice! > >> > > Trusting all certificates looks OK, as again it just means setting >> > > some local properties. There's already some JMeter code for >> > > certificate trust which might be re-usable. If not, then the code you >> > > supplied can be used once the Copyright notices have been dealt with: >> OK, copyright notice will be added! > > The copyright lines need to be removed, rather than added ... sure ;-)! we will submit a new version with the official apache headers. > >> Again (see other thread), I have to admit that the "Install TrustStore" >> functionality uses the same (sun copyright protected) class as >> SMTPSampler - if sun licensed files cannot be used within JMeter, this >> class would have to be re-written. > > Yes. > > However is it necessary? > > Is it not just enough to trust everything? generally, yes! however the functionality "trust all certificates" (as mentioned in the other thread) doesn't work with starttls, so I think some enhancement(s) would be needed for starttls support. >> Again, can you agree with the following TODO list? >> - add copyright headers to all files > > No - the problem is that the files have copyright lines in them; > these need to be removed. ok, we're going to do so and re-submit the changes.
michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]