sure.  I'd like to have a controller that encapsulates a bunch of jdbc
calls underneath it eg "submit job"

I'd then like to measure the throughput of how often the controller get's
executed - at the moment I get the throughput of all the jdbc calls that
are exectuted, right?  I'd like to know "how many jobs are submitted per
minute" even though to submit a job, multiple jdbc calls are made.

If this is not currently possible, believe it would be a useful enhancement
- any pointers on where I'd start to extend things to include this?

Many thanks,

David




Jordi Salvat i Alabart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/09/2003 06:28:47 PM

Please respond to "JMeter Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To:    JMeter Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:    Re: Constant Throughput with loop


OK -- forget my last message, then.

I just don't understand your question. Can you please clarify?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry - my bad.  Figured out that it is all done per thread, so that was
> what was confusing me!
>
> Would still like to have a constant throughput for the number of times a
> controller is executed, though.  Is there a way to do this without having
> to count everything within that controller?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by David Hay/Lex/Lexmark on 04/09/2003
> 01:20 PM ---------------------------
>
>
> David Hay
> 04/09/2003 12:57 PM
>
> To:    "JMeter Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
>
> Subject:    Constant Throughput with loop  (Document link: David Hay)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a constant throughput in a test plan that includes a
> loop.
>
> I tried the Constant Throughput Timer first with just a single JDBC call,
> and it works fine if there is no loop.  However, placing the call in a
loop
> makes it all goes wierd (doesn't keep throughput constant, seems to go in
> fits and starts).  I have tried placing the time both inside and outside
> the loop, to no avail.
>
> Also, I would like to have a constant throughput for the number of times
a
> controller is executed.  Is there a way to do this?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

--
Salut,

Jordi.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]









---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to