I must agree with Jordi here. Rather than making the tool any more complicated by adding more features, effort should be put into refining exiting features.
Someone wanna start a new project aimed at more complicated feature testing? Ryo > My personal position would be to move towards allowing functional > testing, but still keep performance testing a priority. That is: never > make a change that improves functional testing ability if it degrades > performance testing ability. The opposite could happen, although I guess > we would always go great lengths to try to make both requirements > compatible. > > The rationale for this is: > - JMeter is a performance testing tool -- or at least that's its charter. > - Performance testing requires functional testing features: you need to > see that function is not degraded under load. -------- Ryo Sode SQA Lead Engineer Internet Division FileMaker Inc. TEL 408.987.7500 AIM ScreenName: ryosode --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
