On 8/10/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that is possible in jmeter. The threads are independent
> of each other and do not thread.join(thread) to the best of my
> knowledge.

But this kind of functional testing becomes essential when trying to
test asynchronous non-request-response based protocols.  Any idea if
support for this is planned?

> On 8/10/05, Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let me explain in more detail.
> >
> > There are two threads, X and Y.  Both run simultaneously to reach
> > checkpoint A.  X sends a request to the server which is sent to Y.  X
> > needs to know that Y received what was sent.
> >
> > To implement the above I was asking for something like dependency
> > configuration / join implementation.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vinod.
> >
> > On 8/10/05, Christian Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am I right that you want to run both Threads at the same time, but one
> > > should wait for the other finishing?
> > >
> > > If you click TestPlan there is an Option that runs ThreadsGroups one after
> > > another. But maybe it's more practicable to manage it with the Controllers
> > > and Timers.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Vinod Panicker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. August 2005 10:09
> > > An: [email protected]
> > > Betreff: Dependency support for threads
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there any way by which I can specify that Thread x needs to wait till
> > > Thread y completes successfully?
> > >
> > > I'm trying to test an asynchronous TCP based IM protocol.  So I want to be
> > > able to test if a message sent by x reached y.  x and y will be 
> > > independent
> > > sessions.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Vinod.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to