I am using "all active threads in current thread group", what does this mean if I have the following configuration? Do I have to care number of threads in this case to configure the constant throughput timer?
threads: 10 Ramp up period: 60 constant throughput timer: 17.0 ( I want to have frequency=100/hr). Iterations: 100 ============ sebb-2-2 wrote: > > On 09/11/2007, tiffany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The calculations is based on 1 thread (1 user) or number of threads >> doesn't >> count? >> >> Actually, I have a test with the following configuration: >> >> threads: 1 >> iterations: 100 >> constant throughput timer: 30.0 (all active threads in current thread >> group) >> >> Frequency needs per hour: 200 >> >> By the calcuation: I should put 3.33 per min. I tried it to run with >> constant throughput timer: 3.33 (all active threads in current thread >> group) >> , it did't give me the right frequency( in hr), > > what did it give? > >> by testing, I figure it out, >> I need to set constant throughput timer: 30.0 in order to have frequency= >> 200 /hr. >> >> I don't really understand this. What about if threads=120, what should I >> set >> in constant throughput timer?? > > If you are using anything but "this thread only", then it does not > matter how many threads there are - the delays are calculated as > needed to provide the throughput. > >> >> ================= >> >> sebb-2 wrote: >> > >> > 200 per hour=200/60 per min=3.33 per min >> > >> > On 18/09/2007, tiffany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks for the answer. >> >> >> >> I still have a question, if I want my test case which consists 9 >> requests >> >> run 200 times per hour. How to calculate the throughput time for >> it(What >> >> should I set in the Constant Throughput Timer ?) >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tiffany >> >> ===================== >> >> >> >> sebb-2 wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Constant Timer always sleeps for the amount of time specified. >> >> > >> >> > Constant Throughput Timer sleeps for as long as necessary to try and >> >> > maintain the throughput. >> >> > >> >> > On 13/09/2007, tiffany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> I am not sure the difference % the usage of Constant Timer and >> >> Constant >> >> >> throughput timer even I have read the user manual. >> >> >> >> >> >> I try to do a web load test with 3 test cases, all 3 test cases are >> in >> >> a >> >> >> test plan as the following: >> >> >> >> >> >> - test plan >> >> >> - thread group 1 >> >> >> - HTTP request >> >> >> - other requests... >> >> >> - constant timer/constant throughput timer >> >> >> - thread group 2 >> >> >> - HTTP request >> >> >> - other requests... >> >> >> - constant timer/constant throughput timer >> >> >> - thread group 3 >> >> >> - HTTP request >> >> >> - other requests... >> >> >> - constant timer/constant throughput timer >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What is the difference of using constant timer and constant >> throughput >> >> >> timer >> >> >> in each thread group? Actually, I try to create a test plan with 3 >> >> test >> >> >> cases on it and each test case needs to run with different >> frequency. >> >> For >> >> >> example : >> >> >> test case 1 needs to run 20 times per hour, >> >> >> test case 2 needs to run 100 times per hour, >> >> >> test case 3 needs to run 60 times per hour. >> >> >> >> >> >> What timer should I use in the above case? >> >> > >> >> > Constant Throughput Timer. >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Tiffany >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Constant-Timer-vs-Constant-throughput-timer-tf4437423.html#a12660224 >> >> >> Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Constant-Timer-vs-Constant-throughput-timer-tf4437423.html#a12762992 >> >> Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Constant-Timer-vs-Constant-throughput-timer-tf4437423.html#a13673859 >> Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Constant-Timer-vs-Constant-throughput-timer-tf4437423.html#a13753103 Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
