sebb wrote:
> On 29/05/2008, Pieter Ennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering why the latency time ('lt') for nested HTTP requests is
>> not propagated to its parent sample, while the normal time ('t') is.
>>
>> <httpSample t="1645" lt="0" ts="1212063826434" s="false" lb="HTTP
>> Request" rc="200" rm="OK" tn="Thread Group 1-1" dt="text" by="92031">
>> <httpSample t="428" lt="427" ts="1212063826434" s="true"
>> lb="http://cnn.com/"; rc="302" rm="Found" tn="Thread Group 1-1" dt="text"
>> by="260"/>
>> <httpSample t="1217" lt="399" ts="1212063826862" s="true"
>> lb="http://www.cnn.com/"; rc="200" rm="OK" tn="Thread Group 1-1"
>> dt="text" by="91511"/>
>> </httpSample>
>>
>> In the above snippet, the outer t=1217+428=1645, but the outer lt=0. Is
>> there a reason for this?
>>
>
> Probably because it was overlooked...
>
> I assume the latency should be saved from the first child, as that was
> the first response?
I'd say it should be the sum of the two childs, as the behaviour of 'lt'
then matches 't'.
Ciao,
--
- Pieter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
