On 29/05/2008, Pieter Ennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi sebb, > > > sebb wrote: > >> > I assume the latency should be saved from the first child, as that was > >> > the first response? > >> > >> > >> I'd say it should be the sum of the two childs, as the behaviour of 'lt' > >> then matches 't'. > >> > > > > Latency = time to first response. > > > > I don't think it makes sense to add latencies - likewise one does not > > add minima or maxima. > > > Ah... unfortunately for us, in that way it will not be of any use here, > but I can see how this makes sense too. > > Still we would find it very strange if 'lt' was handled differently from > both 't' and 'by'. In a sense, the parent container is not a real > request anyway, right? > > Additionally, the latency sometimes can be also be viewed as a > 'processing time' in which case it might make sense to do the sum, as > both pages require processing time in an equal way.
Latency is not the same as processing time. It is time to first response, which includes the network time. > Any thoughts on this? > > -- > > - Pieter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
