The tests seems to take 2x as long to execute under JMeter. When comparing successfull transactions against time, the tx/sec numbers are correct, but the reported output is approx half what other load tests report for the same process run from the same location.
I wonder if the difference is in how java opens the connections or manages the threads. On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:56 -0700, kbutler [via JMeter] wrote: Is it a real difference or a reported difference? i.e. do 1000 transactions actually take as long under both test tools but are reported as being slower under JMeter? or JMeter really takes twice as long to execute the tests? ________________________________ View message @ http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-providing-bad-results-tp2640077p2642744.html To unsubscribe from Jmeter providing bad results, click here<http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/template/NodeServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2640077&code=Sm9zaFNtaXRoQGFka25vd2xlZGdlLmNvbXwyNjQwMDc3fC0zNTQ1OTQ3MTU=>. -- View this message in context: http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-providing-bad-results-tp2640077p2642780.html Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
