what is the correct value though? While the load test runs , access the page in a browser from a different machine and check the response time (using firebug or YSlow or PageSpeed) - Check only the time it takes to return the page (not the CSS / javascript etc - assuming that you dont have fetch embedded requests). Also do you your tests have data assertions? i.e. you are being able to detect errors reliably?
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:22 PM, jesmith17 <[email protected]>wrote: > > The tests seems to take 2x as long to execute under JMeter. When comparing > successfull transactions against time, the tx/sec numbers are correct, but > the reported output is approx half what other load tests report for the same > process run from the same location. > > I wonder if the difference is in how java opens the connections or manages > the threads. > > > > On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:56 -0700, kbutler [via JMeter] wrote: > Is it a real difference or a reported difference? i.e. do 1000 > transactions actually take as long under both test tools but are reported as > being slower under JMeter? or JMeter really takes twice as long to execute > the tests? > > ________________________________ > View message @ > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-providing-bad-results-tp2640077p2642744.html > To unsubscribe from Jmeter providing bad results, click here< > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/template/NodeServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2640077&code=Sm9zaFNtaXRoQGFka25vd2xlZGdlLmNvbXwyNjQwMDc3fC0zNTQ1OTQ3MTU= > >. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-providing-bad-results-tp2640077p2642780.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
