Hi, I am using Jmeter to stress the server with 50 concurrent users.At the same time I note down the manual time( i.e user perceived time as i am interested in the high level UI rendering time) by opening a browser and following the same steps as in Jmeter script. I am using three different machines for this ( app server, Jmeter scripts & for browser). when I note the time taken by Jmeter for loading the jsp i am interested in it shows - average time = 19s and 90% line = 35s, whereas the manual time for loading the same page is 7s. I have used cache manager in Jmeter and also am using download all embedded resources so that jmeter can emulate the browser behaviour to some extent. since Jmeter is not a browser and doesn't give the UI rendering time, I expected the manual time to be more than the jmeter time not vice-versa. (the times mentioned earlier are averages of multiple runs). Now I am thinking should I even compare the two times? -- View this message in context: http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-time-vs-User-Percieved-time-tp2644274p2644274.html Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
