Hey Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
The manual test is being run only with 1 user whereas Jmeter is being run with 50 users. Have you tried running Jmeter with 1 user and then comparing the times? Deepak -- Keigu Deepak +91-9765089593 [email protected] http://www.simtree.net Skype: thumsupdeicool Google talk: deicool Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool "Contribute to the world, environment and more : http://www.gridrepublic.org " On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:50 AM, ankitR <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using Jmeter to stress the server with 50 concurrent users.At the same > time I note down the manual time( i.e user perceived time as i am > interested > in the high level UI rendering time) by opening a browser and following the > same steps as in Jmeter script. I am using three different machines for > this > ( app server, Jmeter scripts & for browser). when I note the time taken by > Jmeter for loading the jsp i am interested in it shows - average time = 19s > and 90% line = 35s, whereas the manual time for loading the same page is > 7s. > I have used cache manager in Jmeter and also am using download all embedded > resources so that jmeter can emulate the browser behaviour to some extent. > since Jmeter is not a browser and doesn't give the UI rendering time, I > expected the manual time to be more than the jmeter time not vice-versa. > (the times mentioned earlier are averages of multiple runs). > Now I am thinking should I even compare the two times? > -- > View this message in context: > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-time-vs-User-Percieved-time-tp2644274p2644274.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
