thanks very much for the response, regarding "The aggregate graph does not
display the deviation" i calculated it manually :) and it is not the same
one shown in the table.

regarding the bugzilla and the JTL can elaborate more details as it is my
first time here :)

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:53 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2 September 2011 13:07, Sherif Amer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello, i re test the full test plan again and i got strange results for
> > the average and for the deviation
> > i have 4 pages and i made 10 request per page so the result is 40 request
> > when i show the result in table i got the Average = 142 and the deviation
> =
> > 93
> > when i show the result in aggregate graph and i calculated the average
> and
> > the deviation  the results were different from the results on the table
> !!!
>
> The aggregate graph does not display the deviation, so I don't
> understand what you mean.
>
> >   in the graph the Average = 140 and the deviation = 41.
> > any idea why the results are different even it is same number of requests
> > and the same test plan !!?
>
> Please provide the JTL results file - but do not send it to the list.
>
> Create a bugzilla issue and attach the JTL file to that.
> Make sure you explain what you see in the listeners and what you
> expected to see.
>
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:11 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Note that OpenOffice.org Calc has STDEV and STDEVP functions that
> >> calculate the two different versions of std. dev.; I imagine Excel has
> >> similar functions.
> >>
> >> On 1 September 2011 16:06, Sherif Amer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Thanks very much for the clarification, i will re create the full test
> >> > scenario and update you.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 1 September 2011 15:17, Sherif Amer <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > view result in *table*
> >> >>
> >> >> OK, I see - you mean the figure in red at the bottom of the screen.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have just written a test using the Java sampler so I can ensure
> that
> >> >> the correct times are created.
> >> >>
> >> >> I get the same average, but the deviation is calculated as 280, not
> 581
> >> >> or
> >> >> 323.
> >> >> Same if I use the Summary Listener.
> >> >>
> >> >> The JMeter value agrees with the "population standard deviation",
> >> >> where the sum of square diffs is divided by the number of values
> (i.e.
> >> >> 4) before taking the square root.
> >> >>
> >> >> The value 323 results from dividing the sum of squares diffs by 3 (=
> >> >> 4-1) and then taking the square root.
> >> >> This is the "sample standard deviation".
> >> >>
> >> >> Both are valid interpretations of standard deviation. Perhaps JMeter
> >> >> should have used the latter, but it does not.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't understand where the value 581 comes from.
> >> >> If you still have the raw sample data, perhaps you can create a
> >> >> Bugzilla issue and attach the JTL file with a screenshot of the Table
> >> >> Listener.
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 1 September 2011 15:06, Sherif Amer <[email protected]
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Which sampler were you using?
> >> >> >> > *HTTP request*
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Sorry, I meant - which Listener were you using?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Which version of JMeter?
> >> >> >> > *2.4*
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:21 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> On 1 September 2011 13:56, Sherif Amer
> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > i made load test for 4 pages and the sample time was
> >> >> >>  426,1093,1127,921
> >> >> >> >> and
> >> >> >> >> > when i showed the result in table
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > The average was 892 which is ok
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Agreed.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > And the deviation was 581 which is totally wrong, if you
> >> >> >> >> > calculate
> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >> > yourself the result will simply will be 323.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Which sampler were you using?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Which version of JMeter?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:48 PM, sebb <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> On 1 September 2011 13:43, Sherif Amer
> >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > hello !!
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > i have question :) does Jmeter calculating the the
> deviation
> >> >> >> >> incorrectly
> >> >> >> >> >> in
> >> >> >> >> >> > the listener like the table and graphic shapes ?
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> No.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> What makes you think the calculations are wrong?
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Please provide some evidence.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Sherif Amer
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to