Hi Miguel,
I know. I had hoped to start on that this week, but ran into some semi-expected problems getting a computational package going on our Physics beowulf cluster, so I got distracted.
I did look at the code a bit and saw some comments about getAtomSetCount not been implemented. It looks to me like you did, but I have a question about why you did it differently than how the other atomsetCollection fields (like fileHader, collectionName etc.) are accessed from the SmarterJmolAdapter. You return the value by calling a get method, as opposed to directly accessing the field. Show we do it one way or another or do you feel that mixing the approaches up is fine?
Ren�
On Oct 29, 2004, at 3:45 PM, Miguel wrote:
Good.
Rene, I know that we need to pick up the development on the names/properties stuff.
Miguel
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id065&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
