> On Monday 02 September 2002 23:07, Bradley Smith wrote: > > My opinion of the patch is that it is deficient in a number of areas, and > > is not ready to go into Jmol. > > Ok, those below are all valid points... But what is your point on inclusion of > the extention in general?
I don't understand the question. My point is as orginally stated above. It is not yet ready to be included. It first needs improvements in the areas noted. Bradley ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
