Egon,

My thoughts ...

I think that some of the code that is in the old Atom.java should be moved
out of there.
For example, all the references to transform and screenPosition (and
screenX/Y/Z/Diameter) should be part of AtomShape, not part of the basic
Atom representation.

You may want to keep that in mind as you are making changes.

Just my opinion.

Miguel

> On Wednesday 27 November 2002 16:55, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
>> Like Miguel, I will check in the changes gradually, and hope that
>> things don't break. Miguel, please continue the work you are doing
>> now... My goal is to keep the 'old' Jmol methods in as long a I can,
>> possibly making the old method a wrapper method (as in the
>> getAtomNumber() method in the first patch)... If I change any API,
>> I'll fix it for all classes in the same patch... That should give you
>> a stable as possible basis. But again, I'll do that as little as
>> possible, and never without warning...
>
> I did not mention this... but I'll deprecate those methods... and they
> will be  at least a number of days deprecated before they get
> removed.... and still  then I'll announce removing the method.
>
> Egon


--------------------------------------------------
Miguel Howard                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c/Pe�a Primera 11-13 esc dcha 6B
37002 Salamanca
Espa�a Spain
--------------------------------------------------
telefono casa 923 27 10 82 movil 650 52 54 58
--------------------------------------------------
To call from the US dial    9:00 am Pacific US   =
home 011 34 923 27 10 82   12:00 noon Eastern US =
cell 011 34 650 52 54 58    6:00 pm Spain
--------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to