Citeren Peter Murray-Rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 15:35 22/03/2004 +0100, Miguel Howard wrote: > >Q: Is there any reason to have references to Aelfred2 and Xerces in the > >code and in the build.xml files? > > No - If these are included as Jars there can be problems between versions.
Not in the Javac task... I included gnujaxp in the list (I think) because in that way it also runs on pre 1.4 JVMs ... but I did not actually think about wether Jmol runs with pre 1.4 anyway... > We had this discussion with CDK some months back - I think all references > to specific parsers are removed. Yes, there should no longer be source code compilation dependencies on one specific implementation. Egon ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
