What is more complex ?Size, ok, but people get the freedom to choose a XML library...An honest question ... What is the value in giving people a choice of XML library?
1. To write a parser for all arbitrary chemical file formats, nearly every program introduces proudly it's own format (why, just why ?)!
or
2. To write a complex parser (CML) to allow to store and read ALL (actual available and all following unknown requested) informations in a verbose way ?
So, i think, this depends on your requirements.
Kind regards, Joerg
-- Dipl. Chem. Joerg K. Wegner Center of Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT) Department of Computer Architecture Univ. Tuebingen, Sand 1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany Phone: (+49/0) 7071 29 78970 Fax: (+49/0) 7071 29 5091 E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www-ra.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de -- Never mistake motion for action. (E. Hemingway)
Never mistake action for meaningful action.
(Hugo Kubinyi,2004)------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
