Rene wrote: > Besides the Float one, would we also have similar ones for the AtomSet > properties?
Sorry ... I do not understand what you are asking. [snip] > I assume that this also means that the readers will need to be adjusted > to add the vectors, and charges as an AtomProperty, in addition to the > current way of adding them? There is no need to add these itesm as AtomProperties. They will be stored as primitive data types in class members ... as they are today. But the implementation of getAtomProperty() will do the right thing. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
