Am Montag, den 15.08.2005, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Egon Willighagen:
> > > I've worked a bit on Jmol's build.xml... it's not really split up, but if
> > > you check out Jmol CVS HEAD, and do 'ant apisio-dist'. It goes on on what
> > > you did with the apisio.classes file, which I slightly modified... it now
> > > builds a distrib from which I can compile jmolApis.jar and jmolIO.jar...
> > > and CDK can be compiled using these...
> > >
> > > So, I hope this cleans up the circular dependency properly...
> >
> > Yes, this is a possible solution.
> >
> > One thing I want to ask: Why these classes don't go into the cdk project
> > (into an own module, e.g. cdk-jmol.jar)? 
> 
> Convenience for the CDK developers I guess... From CVS, things compile 
> nicely...
> 
> > Is there any reason, that this circular dependency is still kept?
> 
> No special reason...
> 
> But is this setup not working for you:
> 
> 1. build jmol-api deb from jmolApiosIO-bla.tar.gz
> 2. build CDK deb based on that jmol-api deb
> 3. build jmol deb from the regular jmol-bla.tar.gz

It should (with still massive editing). For step 3 I have to remove all
files contained in the Jmol-API jars. So I said, it is a possible
solution, but still not the cleanest, because I have to modify the
source I get myself.

Regards, Daniel



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to