On Monday 22 August 2005 04:22 pm, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Monday 22 August 2005 03:52 pm, Miguel wrote: > > > Ok, what approach shall we take? > > > > > > 2. have all new atoms as seperate internal objects > > > - easier to implement symmetry operations that could lead to > > > overlapping atoms > > > - memory is no problem for upto 10k atoms, so why worry > > > > In general, I think that having them separate is a better idea. > > Ok. I think I can manage adding new atoms... but how would I remove them > again, to just have the original atoms again?
And how would I tell Jmol to draw more than one unit cell? I think I will need to add the lattice dimensions as fields somewhere... where could I best do that? Egon ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
