De: Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Right now we have
>
>(Viewer myViewer).getProperty("atomInfo")
>(Viewer myViewer).getProperty("bondInfo")
>(Viewer myViewer).getProperty("modelInfo")
>(Viewer myViewer).getProperty("chainInfo")
>(Viewer myViewer).getProperty("polymerInfo")
>
>which all return Hashtable objects.
>You can explore what they produce at
>http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/test/json/property.htm
>
>I realize they are not optimal. I'm trying to think of ways to
>make them more usable. With atomInfo and bondInfo you can specify an
>atom set. I'm suspecting that for the povray, we should actually
>create one called "povrayInfo"
Let's try without "povrayInfo", I don't think it's good to start adding new
properties just for one specific need. I will see what I can get from the
current properties.
Nico
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
