that makes sense.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
De: "Miguel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is there any particular reason we are NOT using a check of the file
extension for a last-ditch resolver determination of file type?
I think that as a last-ditch resolver attempt it would be fine.
There's one think that woul be very problematic: the Resolver doesn't know about "files",
it only knows about "BufferedReader".
And it's normal since Jmol can read not only files but also inline strings for
example.
When I started working on the multiple files reading feature, I wanted to get
the file name + directory and that too difficult, so I found an other way ;)
Nico
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
--
Robert M. Hanson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 507-646-3107
Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
