>> When I release the 10.00 version, I called it 10.00 because I fully >> expected to have to make follow-on release called '10.01' or '10.02' >> >> The question is ... What do we call this release? >> >> And, if we do a minor bug fix, what do we call the follow-on release. >> >> I would rather preserve the digits after the second decimal point for >> development stuff. >> >> I am comfortable calling this release 10.1 ... with the minor bug fixes >> being called 10.11 and 10.12 >> >> At some point (not very far in the future) we would release 10.2 with new >> features. > >Please not. In your scheme you want that > >10.2 > 10.11 > >But that's not true. In reality > >10.1 < 10.2 >10.2 < 10.11 >10.20 > 10.11 > >The versions will not be comparable when you realize your idea.
I agree with Daniel, I would rather see increasing version numbers. I would prefer to keep the naming scheme you were using since 10.00.00, eventually with the removal of the unnecessary leading 0. I would say : - 10.1 (or 10.1.0) for the next release - 10.1.1 for the first 'pre-'release (bugfix) - 10.1.x for the x 'pre-'release (bugfix and improvments) What about putting the naming scheme decided in the Release Procedures of the Wiki ? Nico ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
