Feature Requests item #955762, was opened at 2004-05-18 04:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hansonr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379136&aid=955762&group_id=23629
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. >Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miguel (michaelthoward) >Assigned to: Bob Hanson (hansonr) Summary: script queuing Initial Comment: ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol goes Strap From: "Miguel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, May 18, 2004 0:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- [snip] > However, I can not send two commands directly one after the other. I have to sleep after each command. The best way to send multiple commands is to just send a longer script. Commands are separated by newlines (or semicolons); longScript = stript1 + "\n" + script2; > Is this intended ? How long should I sleep ? Hmmm ... I am sure that the current behavior is probably buggy if you send one script immediately after another. Currently, scripts do not queue. I am not sure exactly what to do about this. It has been a while since I thought about it ... it needs some work. Q: Why do you want to send two scripts, one immediately after the other? Q: To solve your immediate problem, can you accomplish what you need to by concatenating your scripts? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bob Hanson (hansonr) Date: 2006-08-22 17:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1082841 jmolScriptWait() implemented in Jmol-11.js ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Miguel (migueljmol) Date: 2006-03-18 07:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050060 The scriptWait mechanism will work as a solution in many cases. However, I think that a queue of pending scripts is a good idea. But that is not going to happen soon. The submitteer of the bug sent me a patch to apply in order to provide a queue. Unfortunately, the patch was flawed and had several race conditions ... so I did not apply it. I would like to keep this bug open, because we should implement it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nicolas (nicove) Date: 2006-03-18 00:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1096197 Is the implementation of scriptWait() enough for this need ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=379136&aid=955762&group_id=23629 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
