El 29 Nov 2006 a las 20:13, Miguel escribió: > > 2) Wouldn't it be better to have an option to set the inner width and > > height? > > Yes. That is what everyone wants.
I agree. > > 3) Can I depend that from platform to platform the overall width is 12 > > more than the inner frame width and the overall height is 116 more than > > the inner frame height (which is true on my PC), or is that not > > dependable? > > You cannot depend upon that. Will differ across OS's. Could differ between > JVM releases. Might even differ within an OS (using large fonts in > Windows). Yes, it happens. In my PC, WinXPsp2, "normal" fonts setting but using 120ppp (which makes fonts, icons, etc. 125% larger), I get a window 488x371 pixels, +/-1px (i.e., not 116 but 129px less height) > > If I can, then I can just set up an additional option -G > > instead of -g that sets the window size from the frame size instead of > > the other way around. > > I would vote for having you use -g and change the meaning. Me too > > 4) Any objections to setting the Jmol application default window size > > such that a square inner frame 500x500 is used (and we don't have to > > fiddle with "set zoomLarge off")? > > no opinion. OK to me. > > 5) Suggestions? > > You may need to play around to get the window size that you want. > > 1. Make a guess at the outer window size ... +12 & +116 > 2. Check the inner pane size Can that be done automatically, or you mean manually by the user? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
