Right, so in Java 1.1 we have: and(BitSet) o clear(int) o clone() o equals(Object) o get(int) o hashCode() o or(BitSet) o set(int) o size() o toString() o xor(BitSet)
and in Java 1.3 we have those plus: void andNot(BitSet set) int length() I see I employed andNot five times; I may have used length(), but I've tried to avoid it. What's the simplest equivalent of "andNot" ? Bob Miguel wrote: >>not necessarily. These are all very easy. Please identify them one by >>one and let me take a whack at them. >> >>Bob >> >>Andrew Waterhouse wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi Bob, >>> >>>On delving further into the code, it turns out there are several uses of >>>code post 1.1, mainly related to the BitSet. Even when compilers are set >>>to target 1.1, 1.1 jvms can't cope. >>> >>> > >Yes, there were a number of very useful BitSet methods that were added >after Java 1.1 > > >Miguel > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-developers mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
