> There is one more small issue concerning Chime to JMol migration: > while Chime starts numbering atoms (and everything else) at zero (a > programmers choice), JMol starts numbering with atom 1 ( a chemists, or > any other 'normal' person's choice). Hens,
I need to look into this issue and understand it. I would have sworn that RasMol started numbering at 1 ... but I am not sure. My goal is to offer nearly 100% compatibility with existing RasMol/Chime scripts. Therefore, I will adopt the RasMol/Chime numbering convention as the default. > So there is a decision to be made: stick to Atom-one, and increase all > your numbers in current scripts by one (not a big deal), or adopt the > Chime numbering. > My vote would be for the former. If another setting to change this behavior is desirable then we will put in a user option. > Furthermore I support Pat Carroll's compliments for JMol, and his > request for a measuring panel (dist, angle. dihedral) and adjustable > atom radii. Good. I need suggestions for user interface gestures. But, for the applet I want gestures that do *not* require another panel. > Rasmol scripts have a provision for both: set picking distance etc. > (would require a mechanism to place the result somewhere) , > and 'spacefill <number>'. > Greetings, > > Hens Borkent > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
