> sorry - rasmol and chime both accept > > 267-271e > > for chain syntax. :-(
Great :-( I just checked in the code to handle insertion codes. And I was very proud of it ... thought it would be a nice holiday gift for Jan :-) But now I am going to have to back out some of the changes because of the clash in syntax. :-( How can we have a syntax that explicitly distinguishes insertion codes from chains? Jan, what does RasMol 2.7.* do? Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
