Miguel Howard wrote:

sorry - rasmol and chime both accept

267-271e

for chain syntax. :-(



Great :-(


I just checked in the code to handle insertion codes. And I was very proud
of it ... thought it would be a nice holiday gift for Jan :-)


Thank you very much Miguel,

But now I am going to have to back out some of the changes because of the
clash in syntax. :-(

How can we have a syntax that explicitly distinguishes insertion codes
from chains?


an 'i' after the /
[HIS]84:A.CA;B/1iD
*/1iD
or as all wildcards
*/?iD
*/*iD

Jan, what does RasMol 2.7.* do?


I was very sorry to report, that it lacks an expression for insertion code and suggest to prepare a list of all symbols without meaning in selection expression context (and a list of those which are already assigned to a primitive - and which - would be nice to have, too [HIS]84:A.CA;B/0 :-)
Regards, Jan




Miguel







------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to