at 10.40a EDT on 2003 December 16 Tuesday Jan Reichert said:
>
> sub convertSlangStrict {
> my $text= shift;
> $text=~ s/(\d+)([a-z])(?!\])\b/$1:$2/ig;
> return $text;
> }
>
> and if it is an old script, that is no
> #!rasmol -version 2.7.2.2
> header (this use of version parameter has to be implemented in RasMol).
> Regards, Jan
>
>
this ignores Chime scripts, and hand-coded scripts, that do not use a shebang
and are around in great numbers.
this seems like an awful lot of work to avoid using a carat to indicate
insertion codes. why? especially since there are no scripts that currently
use them for rasmol, chime, or jmol. so...
why is the carat so unwelcome here? and how often are insertion codes used
in pdb files, that it warrants such scripting convolutions to get rid of the
carat snytax?
somewhat bewildered,
:tim
--
timothy driscoll
molvisions - molecular graphics & visualization
<http://www.molvisions.com/>
usa:north carolina:wake forest
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
