Rich said: >> I need to give that one a special name. > > Does this name need to be visible to users/scripters? > > unitcell => the unit cell at 0,0,0 > > aunitcell => any other unit cell
Actually, that works great for me! >> Jan proposed 'crystal' ... What do you think of that? > > But crystals are collections of unit cells with faces :-) i.e. they > exist in the real world as something you can look at. I wouldn't want to > overload the term "crystal" with such a meaning. You are right ... this overloading of the term 'crystal' would be a problem. I think that we are 'crystalizing' around unitcell, aunitcell, and multicell. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
