On May 7, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Bob Hanson wrote:
I think there are a couple of issues here.� With the Mozilla browsers, as I understand it, there is the main tree and the branches.� The tree still relies on java 1.3.� �Until that changes, the branches (FireFox et. a.l) will not change.� Now that fact that a single programmer can write a small open source plugin that corrects the issue says to me that we need to be harassing Mozilla development.� However, clearly Apple broke something with Tiger that makes the plug-in need to be revised. On the Safari issue, they have clearly broken something along the way -- I think about 10.3.8.� I am not enough of a programmer to know what they did; I can only see the results.� My observation is that a page will work fine using either 10.3.9 or 10.4, as long as it is the first instance of the applet loaded. And the issue does not seem to be there in our campus version of 10.3.5.� This seems to me to be a different problem, though I will rely on Tim to be more specific.
On the issue of uniqueness:� I have not seen similar complaints elsewhere, but I will do some searching of the apple discussions.� But, a question for us,� is there something unique about Jmol that is not common to other applets?
You need to be a developer -- which you can self declare -- and subscribe to the developer list.� I have done that some time ago.� �But I think we need to agree on what we are going to say before we file the bug.� �I think Tim has already done.
J. Philip Bays Professor of Chemistry Science Hall 158 Saint Mary's College Notre Dame� IN� 46556 (574) 284-4663 |
- [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Philip Bays
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Bob Hanson
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Philip Bays
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Bob Hanson
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Philip Bays
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Bob Hanson
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Philip Bays
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Bob Hanson
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Philip Bays
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Bob Hanson
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Philip Bays
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Bob Hanson
- Re: [Jmol-users] Tiger and jmol Philip Bays

