On Tuesday 30 August 2005 18:22, Miguel wrote: > I was told that: > - the Royal Chemical Society mandates that everything be done in > nanometers > - many publications no longer accept angstroms
I remember a discussion on this on the list. But cannot find it with Google. Conclusion indeed was that angstrom where to be phased out. > - angstroms are not even taught in European schools At our university we did, but angstrom is indeed a non-standard distance measured and deprecated, though still often used. > Those sounded like very good reasons to me. Agreed. But it's switchable anyway, right? > I am quite sure there was some discussion of this on the mailing list > before I changed it. Confirmed (see above). Egon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PhD student on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics Radboud University Nijmegen http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/egonw/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
