> Miguel wrote: > >> >>Note that the <script> tag alone is valid if the default has been set for >>the page using either a meta tag in the header: >> >> <META http-equiv="Content-Script-Type" content="text/javascript"> > > I just tried this on <http://validator.w3.org/> but my page did *not* > validate HTML 4.01 strict when I used bare <script> tags. Perhaps it > only works with event handlers in button tags?
That is a shame. I believe that the 4.01 spec is very clear on this point. I have never used the validator, so I am not comfortable filing a bug report. But if David (or someone else) wanted to file a bug then I would certainly be interested in the results. > I just wonder whether we should think about setting a milestone for > the production of revised documentation for the Jmol applet in a > single edited document (electronic and, dare I say it, pdf). Jmol.js has not seen any development for a year ... so documentation would be quite stable. I agree that it would be nice to write better doc. I believe that someone with more applications-level JavaScript and Jmol.js experience than me would have to take the lead. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
