El 20 Oct 2005 a las 0:31, Timothy Driscoll escribió:
> hi Angel,
>
> just curious: that atom naming system is not familiar to me.  is it
> specific to lipids?

Hi, Tim
As far as I know, it's not standard. There are few lipids in the PDB
or in other databases, so I don't think there is a standard
nomenclature.
These PDB files are a lipid bilayer with 200 phospholipid molecules,
obtained through molecular dinamics simulation and geometric
duplication of molecules.
H. Heller, M. Schaefer & K. Schulten [Theoretical Biophysics Group,
Beckmann Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, U.S.A.]
"Molecular dynamics simulation of a bilayer of 200 lipids in the gel
and in the liquid-crystal phases", J. Phys. Chem. 97:8343-60, 1993
http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~heller/membrane/membrane.html
   Links via Protein Explorer:
http://molvis.sdsc.edu/protexpl/pe.htm?id=../pdb/cutc2.pdb
http://molvis.sdsc.edu/protexpl/pe.htm?id=../pdb/cutg2.pdb
http://molvis.sdsc.edu/protexpl/pe.htm?id=../pdb/cutf2.pdb

 I don't know how the authors decided to label the atoms, but since
it is a manually-made PDB I suspect they simply wanted to assign a
unique, reasonably comprehensible name to each.
I checked against the PDB file format description and it is according
to it, but the use of the first number and its character position is
not frequently used in most models (proteins, nucleic); that's the
reason Jmol gets funny about them.

BTW, I solved the problem using wilcards in the atom selector.
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
 Dr. Angel Herraez
 Dep. Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Universidad de Alcala
 E-28871 Alcala de Henares  (Madrid), Spain
 fax: +34-91 885 45 85



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to