> Hello,
>
> The notation 1Hxx is unfortunately standard in all the PDB files
> reporting the coordinates of Hydrogens and it corresponds to Hxx1 in
> standard IUPAC notation.  It comes from the fact that initially in
> the PDB format 3 char slots were reserved for the atom names : it was
> enough for the X-Ray diffraction models, the methodology does not
> allow to determine the position of Hydrogens.  But when the
> structures with Hydrogens come out, there was no place for 4 chars
> atom names. The solution that have been adopted : place the forth
> character before the first !  A very "interesting" solution for all
> the designers of PDB parsers !

What a disaster.


> A last comment, in RasMol, "select LIP.1H47" is recognized.

OK

> I suppose that the Jmol designers didn't know this oddity of the PDB
> format.

That is correct.

The Jmol parser did not anticipate this. I was unable to find an easy fix
for the parser.

You said:

> The notation 1Hxx is unfortunately standard in all the
> PDB files reporting the coordinates of Hydrogens and
> it corresponds to Hxx1 in standard IUPAC notation.

Q: Could one argue that this should actually be Hxx1? And that the proper
syntax should be:

  select [LIP].H471;

If so, then I may be able to fix this at a lower layer, when the .pdb file
is read.

I am not interested in doing this would be considered a hack, but only if
people felt that it was the proper solution.

Q: What does the PDB call these things in mmCif files?

Q: What does the PDB call these things in their XML format?


Miguel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to