too, too funny!
Jan wrote:
Now I'm convinced that the most straight forward solution is an optional
diameter parameter to the connect command, though in most cases I would
render bonds on a per residue level with the wireframe command and not
on a bond type level with connect.
Regards, Jan
Now *I'm* convinced we need something more general that can select
bonds. Actually, "bonds" is not the right word. What I want to be able
to select are pairs of atoms that MIGHT be turned into bonds. Or
might, for example, be used --- oooh --- for dumping an array --
ooooh --- of interatomic distances --- ooooooh. Now THERE's a thought....
What do you think?
selectPairs 1.2 1.4 UNBONDED (carbon) (oxygen)
getProperty("getPairInfo","(selectedPairs)")
or
getProperty("getPairInfo","1.2 1.4 (carbon) (oxygen)")
selectPairs 1.2 1.4 BONDED (carbon) (oxygen)
connect DOUBLE (selectedPairs)
maybe?
Bob
--
Robert M. Hanson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 507-646-3107
Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
