On Tuesday 28 March 2006 15:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, March 28, 2006 5:24 am, Miguel said: > > Several educators have told me that it is a mistake for Jmol to read 2D > > structures ... because of the potential confusion caused by representing > > these structures as flat. > > I'm not sure "mistake" is the right way to characterize it. But it would > be good if the structure was flagged: put up a 2D frank?, only display in > wire-frame?, only allow x/y rotation?, or all three?
I like these ideas. Especially about the x/y rotation. One could even make wireframe the default. Egon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PhD student on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics Radboud University Nijmegen Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/egonw/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
