> Thank you, Miguel. Right, there are many ways to do this. This note is
> intended specifically for those users who already have "hbonds on"
> built into their pages that involve links or buttons. The key point is
> to make sure you do not use just
>
> connect hbonds auto;
>
> in your scripts as a replacement for "hbonds on", as those are not
> equivalent,

Correct.

In RasMol/Chime/Jmol 10.00 the 'hbonds on' command was not dependent upon
the selection set.

> and that you check your pages for instances of "hbonds on"
> prior to installing Jmol version 10.1. In this context,
>
> connect hbonds auto (*) (*)
>
> or
>
> connect hbonds auto (nitrogen) (all)
>
> are precise replacements for "hbonds on" in this context.

Be advised that there *is* another twist to this to this story. I tried to
point it out in my email notification, but it may not be clear to all.

In RasMol/Chime/Jmol 10.0, the behavior of 'hbonds on' depends upon
whether or not there are author-defined hbonds in the underlying file.

Therefore, it is not the case that 'connect auto hbonds (*) (*)' is a
direct replacement for 'hbonds on'

IF you have files which contain hbonds within the files AND you blindly
replace your 'hbonds on' -> 'connect auto hbonds (*) (*)' THEN you will
change the behavior because you previously did not have calculated-hbonds
but now you do.


Miguel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to