On Sep 26, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Bob Hanson wrote: > new command: > > write JPEG|PNG|PDF "filename.xxx" > > so you have that in your script file, you do NOT use the "noDisplay" > option, and there you go! > > Any objection to "write"? > sorry; late to this corner of the party. should this not be 'export' instead? write implies writing a 3D file, in my opinion.
tim > > Rolf Huehne wrote: > >> Bob Hanson wrote: >> >> >>> Jmol users interested in using Jmol for more than viewing: >>> >>> I have added some new command-line options. >>> >>> What do you think of this? (Using the applicatoin from a Windows >>> command prompt) >>> >>> >>> Create a JVXL file directly >>> --------------------------- >>> >>> Jmol -ionx iso.spt myfile.xyz > myfile.jvxl >>> >>> where: >>> >>> -i,--silent silent startup operation >>> -o,--noconsole no console -- all output to sysout >>> -n,--nodisplay no display (much faster) >>> -x,--exit run script and exit >>> >>> iso.spt is: >>> >>> isosurface solvent;show isosurface >>> >>> >>> creates a JVXL solvent surface file. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> <snip> >> >> >>> You get the idea. I just uploaded the code; coming in 10.9.66; >>> suggestions? >>> >>> >>> >>> >> This is really great! >> As someone who works with Unix/Linux systems for more than ten >> years I >> highly appreciate the power of command-line tools (without >> disregarding >> that of mouse-driven tools). >> >> Currently we are using rasmol as command-line tool to build our site >> environment database (a database containing a list of residues >> inside a >> specific distance for all active sites named in PDB files from the >> Protein Data Bank). I have not tried it yet but I guess we could >> now use >> Jmol for this instead. >> >> Currently we are generating all automatically generated images for >> our >> PDB atlas pages (http://www.fli-leibniz.de/IMAGE.html) using >> rasmol as >> command-line tool. Most of the currently manually generated images >> are >> created already using our Jmol viewer. We would really prefer to use >> Jmol also for the automatic image generation. >> >> Q: Is it already possible or might it be possible in the future to >> export a script generated view as an image file with Jmol as a >> command-line tool? >> >> Regards, >> Rolf >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >> share your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn >> cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? >> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> Jmol-users mailing list >> Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
