It is true that when a COMMAND has an error, it is not added to the history.
Isn't it better to fix the script? :) Paul Pillot wrote: >Hello, >I have just realized that the history command (which provides the >history of all commands performed) records also the scripts that failed >to execute because they contain errors. >It is logical, except that when I try to run a script containing all the >history (minus the last command), it can be stopped by a wrong command. >Would it be possible that when a script does not run succesfully it is >not actually added to the history ? Does it makes sense for other users >as well ? >Thanks, >Paul > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-users mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
